I sat down last night in dressing gown and bed socks, lovely and comfortable, and watched the latest version of The Thirty-Nine Steps by John Buchan, this time starring the rather gorgeous Rupert Penry-
Jones as Richard Hannay. Had not liked him much in the ITV version of Persuasion last year, probably because I thought the adaptation was dire, but found him very watchable in this.
What I love about this story is its sheer fun and gung ho attitude. We have a code book, German spies, naval secret plans and what are the Thirty-Nine Steps? In each film version I have seen, a forgettable one with Kenneth More, the Robert Powell version with him hanging from Big Ben and the original Hitchcock version with Robert Donat (which John Buchan loved but his wife did not), the Steps have a different significance and as I have never read the original I quite happily accept each version as it comes along.
The Beeb did last night's adaptation very well, lots of running across the Scottish Moors and swooping planes and vintage cars and a suffragette who turns out to be not all she seems to be, the bedroom scene which thankfully did not result in a full blown sex scene, though there was some very suggestive application of salve on burns on backs etc, and as I had not the faintest idea what was going on most of the time, I just sat back and enjoyed it.
Straight afterwards, over on BBC4, there was an hour long programme on John Buchan, who worked his way up from a lower middle class background to Oxford (where one of his contemporaries was HIllaire Belloc), via South Africa to Governor General of Canada and then Lord Tweedsmuir. It transpired that he had written and published five books while he was at Oxford (written purely as he did not have a private income from his parent so needed to make money) and, at the age of 24, had his name in Who's Who where his occupation was described as 'undergraduate'.
He was a popular author throughout his life, though he is now mainly known for The Thirty Nine Steps and, perhaps, Prester John and Greenmantle but he wrote many more that I, personally, have never heard of. The programme had interviews with Anne Widdicombe, Douglas Hurd and Frederick Forsyth amongst others who are huge fans and talked with great authority and love of his work. This was interspersed with footage from the Boer War, where Buchan served in South Africa, newspaper articles
and criticism of his output which was all extremely interesting and made totally unnecessary the usual footling about of the BBC who can never do a biography of anybody without hauling in the usual actors to portray the parts of whoever they are talking about at the moment.
Thus, each time something was being said about Buchan which could not be illustrated with an authentic film or picture, cue an actor sitting at a desk, dressed in full Edwardian rig and dipping his pen in ink and writing busily. If a character was mentioned, cue actor dressed as character, looking portentous. None of these actors say anything, at all. If they did the BBC would have to pay them more than if they do not open their mouths and we all know the BBC likes to watch how it spends its money (Jonathan Ross anyone? better not go down that route.....)
We were told that Buchan wrote 'the Thirty Nine Steps when he was suffering a bout of ill health with a duodenal ulcer' and guess what? Yes, picture of dumb actor writing busily again, but this time in bed and drinking a glass of milk. The inanity of it all is so infuriating I had to tell myself to calm down and just concentrate on the programme content which was fascinating.
After watching the film and then the feature on Buchan I feel a real curiousity about his work. I have read none of his output and it seems there is an awful lot. Part of me is thinking 'oh goody, if I lilke them just think how many I have got to keep me going' but I am not totally sure they will be for me.
Has anybody out there any thoughts on this or recommendations? I really would be most grateful.
Recent Comments